Prime minister dismisses UN inquiry into government’s discriminatory treatment of disabled people

disability_2218977b

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has asked David Cameron at Prime Minister’s Questions today to publish the details of the Government’s response to the United Nations inquiry into the allegations that Conservative policies are breaching the rights of disabled people in the UK. He also asked if the government intended to co-operate with the inquiry.

Such UN investigations are conducted confidentially by the UN and officials will not confirm or deny whether the UK is currently being put under scrutiny.

However, the ongoing inquiry been widely reported by disability rights groups and campaigners. The Department for Work and Pensions has previously declined to comment on the possibility of an investigation.

Mr Corbyn used his final question to ask about the United Nations inquiry into alleged “grave or systemic violations” of the rights of disabled people in the UK. The PM gave a dismissive response, saying the inquiry may not be “all it’s cracked up to be” and said that disabled people in other countries do not have the rights and support that “they” [disabled people] in the UK are offered. Cameron also implied that Labour’s “strong” equality legislation was a Conservative policy. However, the Equality Act was drafted under the guidance of Harriet Harman.

Jeremy Corbyn asks about David Cameron about his response to the UN inquiry at Prime Minister’s Questions

The United Nations team of investigators are expecting to meet with the Equality and Human Rights Commission, members of parliament, individual campaigners and disabled people’s organisations, representatives from local authorities and academics.

The team will be gathering direct evidence from individuals about the impact of government austerity measures, with a focus on benefit cuts and sanctions; cuts to social care; cuts to legal aid; the closure of the Independent Living Fund (ILF); the adverse impact of the Work Capability Assessment (WCA); the shortage of accessible and affordable housing; the impact of the bedroom tax on disabled people, and also the rise in disability hate crime.

Mr Corbyn said:

“This is deeply embarrassing to all of us in this house and indeed to the country as a whole. It’s very sad news.”

The Government’s approach to people with disabilities had been extremely controversial and been met with criticism from campaign groups. Disabled people have borne the brunt of austerity cuts, losing more income and support than any other social group, and this is despite the fact that Cameron promised in 2010 to protect the poorest, sick and disabled people and the most vulnerable.

In 2013, Dr Simon Duffy at the Centre for Welfare Reform published a briefing outlining how the austerity cuts are targeted. The report says:

The cuts are not fair.

They target the very groups that a decent society would protect:

  • People in poverty (1 in 5 of us) bear 39% of all the cuts
  • Disabled people (1 in 13 of us) bear 29% of all the cuts
  • People with severe disabilities (1 in 50 of us) bear 15% of all the cuts

The report outlines further discrimination in how the austerity cuts have been targeted. The report says:

The unfairness of this policy is seen even more clearly when we look at the difference between the burden of cuts that falls on most citizens and the burdens that fall on minority groups. By 2015 the annual average loss in income or services will be:

  • People who are not in poverty or have no disability will lose £467 per year
  • People who are in poverty will lose £2,195 per year
  • Disabled people will lose £4,410 per year
  • Disabled people needing social care will lose £8,832 per year

Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith said at the  Conservative party conference speech in Manchester that disabled people “should work their way out of poverty.”

The Work and Pensions Secretary has been widely criticised for removing support for disabled people who want to work: by closing Remploy factories, scrapping the Independent Living Fund, cuts to payments for a disability Access To Work scheme and cuts to Employment and Support Allowance.

The reformed Work Capability Assessment has been very controversial, with critics labeling them unfair, arbitrary, and heavily bureaucratic, weighted towards unfairly removing people’s sickness and disability benefit and forcing them to look for work.

The bedroom tax also hits disabled people disproportionately, with around two thirds of those affected by the under-occupancy penalty being disabled.

The United Nations have already deemed that the bedroom tax constitutes a violation of the human right to adequate housing in several ways. If, for example, the extra payments force tenants to cut down on their spending on food or heating their home. There are already a number of legal challenges to the bedroom tax under way in British courts. In principle the judiciary here takes into account the international human rights legislation because the UK has signed and ratified the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

The right to adequate housing is recognised in a number of international human rights instruments that the UK has signed up to.

UN rapporteur Raquel Rolnik called for the UK government last year to scrap its controversial bedroom tax policy. Rolnik’s report was dismissed as a “misleading Marxist diatribe” by Tory ministers, and she had been subject to a “blizzard of misinformation” and xenophobic tabloid reports.

The DWP’s sanctions regime has also been widely discredited, and there has been controvery over death statistics, eventually released by the Department after a long-running refusal to release the information under freedom of information law.

The Daily Mail has already preempted the visit from the special rapporteur, Catalina Devandas Aguilar, who is spearheading the ongoing inquiry into many claims that Britain is guilty of grave or systematic violations of the rights of sick and disabled people, by using racist stereotypes, and claiming that the UN are “meddling”. The Mail blatantly attempted to discredit this important UN intervention and the UN rapporteur before the visit.

Meanwhile, Cameron seems very keen to play the investigation down, and dismiss the impact of his government’s “reforms” on the lives of sick and disabled people.

We are a very wealthy, so-called first-world liberal democracy, the fact that such an inquiry has been deemed necessary at all ought to be a source of great shame for this government.

 

Advertisements

24 thoughts on “Prime minister dismisses UN inquiry into government’s discriminatory treatment of disabled people

  1. I know then told a load of lies about I and other have now got a job, I’m not on JSA or ESA, so that means I am working. I haven’t worked for years or tried because no one would have me and for four of them years I have been passed fit for work and received very little support for it. But Cameron will get a shock when the enquiry of the UN gets underway and he will no longer be able to talk his way out of it. Ps this is a nice blog, who runs it?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Cameron will probably just slate the rapporteur and the UN, then press to scrap our own legislations such as the Human Rights Act – due to be scrapped by summer next year – and the equality act.

      Thanks for the feedback about the blog. It’s just me – sue (kitty)jones that runs it. But I also write for Welfare Weekly now, too/

      Like

    2. oh not the quality act too, so businesses don’t have to employed disabled people any more. That another nail in the coffin in every being able to find any sort of work, And the Tories always manage to get out of everything. However if the do go ahead with working tax credits, might be another nail in the coffin for them; instead. Keep hope anyway, when all else is lost.

      Like

  2. The Tories returning to their Dickensian roots….
    To claim that Disabled people will be able to work their way out of poverty is the worst joke of all by IDS.

    Cuts to ESA, cuts to Access to Work, closure of the ILF and Remploy factories tells you the real story ….
    Making the most vulnerable pay for the Tories best friends Casino losses.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Just call me Dave’s answer was very illuminating. He started off defending tory policy and then he switches into anger. How dare these people complain, they are in a much better position than others like them around the world. So basically his view is that sick and disabled people should live our lives cap in hand and be grateful for the crumbs we are dropped from the table of the ever shrinking group of strivers and not skivers like ourselves.
    His race to the bottom argument just shows how vile and oppressive this government really is.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Good work yet again, Sue.
    And brilliant comment from Cedawnow – a race to the bottom is just what this so-called government is all about.

    Like

    1. The point is that the government cannot dismiss this considerable body of empirical evidence from uk citizens, campaigners, charities, academics and organisations, that their policies are not only harmful, but that they are founded on prejudice and assumptions, as “anecdotal” evidence. That means any further policies that continue this attack on disabled people, refusing to acknowledge their human rights are clearly intentional.

      It’s difficult to prove intent, but if a person has been to court and found guilty of manslaughter on the grounds of negligence, then that person goes out and does it again and again…

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s